Association Between Age and the Incidence of Acute Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is widely performed due to its minimally invasive nature and faster recovery compared with open surgery; however, acute postoperative pain remains a common clinical challenge that may affect recovery and patient satisfaction. Various patient-related factors may influence pain perception. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between age and the incidence of acute postoperative pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Material and methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in 2025 at hospitals affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and included 73 patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy, with sample size determined using the single proportion prevalence formula. Variables assessed included age, BMI, comorbidities, surgical duration, anesthesia type, and acute postoperative pain severity measured by the Visual Analog Scale within 24 hours after surgery.

Results: Postoperative pain was common, with a mean VAS score of 4.28 ± 1.86 and an incidence of 76.71%. Moderate pain was most frequent, and younger patients reported significantly higher pain levels, while pain decreased progressively with age (ANOVA p = 0.018). Age showed a strong negative correlation with VAS scores (r = −0.711, p = 0.001), indicating markedly lower pain intensity in older patients.

Conclusion: Age demonstrated a clear inverse relationship with acute postoperative pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy, with younger patients reporting higher pain intensity and greater analgesic needs. These findings highlight the importance of age responsive pain management protocols to ensure individualized postoperative care and optimized recovery outcomes.

Graphical Abstract

Association Between Age and the Incidence of Acute Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Keywords

Subjects

[1]    Ferenczy, A. (1998). Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Human Reproduction Update, *4*(4), 312–322.
[2]    Struble, J., Reid, S., & Bedaiwy, M. A. (2016). Adenomyosis: A clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, *23*(2), 164–185.
[3]    Bourdon, M., Santulli, P., Marcellin, L., Maignien, C., Maitrot Mantelet, L., Bordonne, C., et al. (2021). Adenomyosis: An update regarding its diagnosis and clinical features. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, *50*(10), Article 102228.
[4]    Krentel, H., & De Wilde, R. L. (2022). Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain or uterine prolapse: A retrospective cohort study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, *78*, Article 103809.
[5]    Puntambekar, S., Shetty, T. S., Goel, A., Chandak, S., & Panchal, S. (2020). Single centre experience of doing safe total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Retrospective analysis of 1200 cases. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India, *70*(5), 376–383.
[6]    Protopapas, A., Vlachos, D. E., Kathopoulis, N., Grigoriadis, T., Zacharakis, D., Athanasiou, S., et al. (2022). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with deep endometriosis: Different technical and postoperative considerations, in comparison with a procedure performed for other benign indications. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, *61*(2), 216–222.
[7]    Gracia, M., de Guirior, C., Valdés Bango, M., Rius, M., Ros, C., Matas, I., et al. (2022). Adenomyosis is an independent risk factor for complications in deep endometriosis laparoscopic surgery. Scientific Reports, *12*(1), Article 7086.
[8]    Casarin, J., Ghezzi, F., Mueller, M., Ceccaroni, M., Papadia, A., Ferreira, H., et al. (2023). Surgical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometriosis: A metacentric cohort study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, *30*(7), 587–592.
[9]    Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P. A. (2004). Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery, *240*(2), 205–213.
[10] Casarin, J., Cromi, A., Bogani, G., Multinu, F., Uccella, S., & Ghezzi, F. (2021). Surgical morbidity of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: Predictors of major postoperative complications. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, *263*, 210–215.
[11] Van den Bosch, T., Dueholm, M., Leone, F. P., Valentin, L., Rasmussen, C. K., Votino, A., et al. (2015). Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: A consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, *46*, 284–298.
[12] Mehasseb, M. K., Bell, S. C., Pringle, J. H., & Habiba, M. A. (2010). Uterine adenomyosis is associated with ultrastructural features of altered contractility in the inner myometrium. Fertility and Sterility, *93*(7), 2130–2136.
[13] Wu, Q., Zhou, Y., Sun, S., Li, H., Cao, S., & Shou, H. (2023). Clinical analysis of acute postoperative pain after total laparoscopic hysterectomy for adenomyosis and uterine fibroids: A prospective observational study. Annals of Medicine, *55*(2), Article 2281510.
[14] Ajao, M. O., Oliveira Brito, L. G., Wang, K. C., Cox, M. K. B., Meurs, E., Goggins, E. R., et al. (2019). Persistence of symptoms after total vs supracervical hysterectomy in women with histopathological diagnosis of adenomyosis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, *26*(5), 891–896.
[15] Choi, E. J., Cho, S. B., Lee, S. R., Lim, Y. M., Jeong, K., Moon, H. S., et al. (2017). Comorbidity of gynecological and nongynecological diseases with adenomyosis and endometriosis. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, *60*(6), 579–586.
[16] Van den Bosch, T., de Bruijn, A. M., de Leeuw, R. A., Dueholm, M., Exacoustos, C., Valentin, L., et al. (2019). Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, *53*(5), 576–582.
[17] Guo, S. W. (2020). The pathogenesis of adenomyosis vis-à-vis endometriosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, *9*(2), Article 485.
[18] Billone, V., Gullo, G., Conti, E., Ganduscio, S., Burgio, S., Baglio, G., et al. (2025). Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Insights from a single center retrospective cohort study with legal considerations. Medicina, *61*(7), Article 1216.
[19] Uccella, S., Marconi, N., Casarin, J., Ceccaroni, M., Boni, L., Sturla, D., et al. (2016). Impact of endometriosis on surgical outcomes and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, *294*(4), 771–778.
[20] Furuhashi, M., Miyabe, Y., Katsumata, Y., Oda, H., & Imai, N. (1998). Comparison of complications of vaginal hysterectomy in patients with leiomyomas and in patients with adenomyosis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, *262*(1–2), 69–73.
[21] Meyer, R., Maxey, C., Hamilton, K. M., Nasseri, Y., Barnajian, M., Levin, G., et al. (2024). Associations between race and ethnicity and perioperative outcomes among women undergoing hysterectomy for adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility, *121*(6), 1053–1062.
[22]    Ameli kalkhoran, S.M, Rabiei, K, Seyed Alizadeh, SM, Heravi, HM, Rouzpeykar, Y, (2022), Analyzing Impact of Intellectual Capital on Business Performance Using Structural Models Based on Customer Knowledge Management, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 7453565
[23] Alliende, R. I., Carrasco, Á. M., Levancini, M., Kovoor, E., Guzmán Rojas, R. A., & Miranda Mendoza, I. (2021). 5,926 hysterectomies: Complications described by Clavien–Dindo classification. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, *41*(7), 1102–1106.
[24] Stewart, K. A., Tessier, K. M., & Lebovic, D. I. (2022). Comparing characteristics of and postoperative morbidity after hysterectomy for endometriosis versus other benign indications: A NSQIP study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, *29*(7), 884–890.e2.